Wednesday, May 6, 2020

General George Washington And His Continental Army Had

General George Washington and his Continental Army had just defeated the English Army. In 1776, the founding fathers of the United States of America signed the Declaration of Independence, according to ushistory.org 60 delegates signed the document that granted the country we know today as the United States free from British rule.Some of the men that inked their name into American history were Thomas Jefferson. Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and John Hancock. From that point on the United States was an independent nation. Being an independent nation means the founding fathers had to establish all the characteristics of a successful country, several example include: government, economic system, laws, etc. It is evident that a country cannot†¦show more content†¦Now let’s take a look at each of the amendments and determine the exact reason why our founding fathers inserted them into our Constitution. The first amendment of the United States states â€Å"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances (Bill of Rights Institute).† In simpler words this amendments means that any citizen may practice any religion that he or she identifies as their faith. It also grants all citizens the right to free speech. Free speech means that an individual can say whatever they wish, without any restrictions, even if the words are inappropriate, disrespect any political leader or disrespect the government itself. We have a right to say what we desire. The first amendment along with granting the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion, allows freedom of press. This allows the press the ability to publish what they desire, even if it is absurd or incorrect. The seco nd amendment of the United States Constitution states â€Å"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed (Bill of Rights Institute).† The second amendment grantsShow MoreRelatedEssay on General George Washington and The Continental Army1009 Words   |  5 Pagesnew ideals was General George Washington and his continental army, but the road ahead of Washington and his men was not an unproblematic one. The winter at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania proved this to Washington and his men. Yet the true American ideal of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were never forgotten in their battle. General George Washington gained command of the continental army in July 3, 1775 from the directions of General Artemus Ward who said, â€Å"The Continental Congress havingRead MoreRevolutionary War1150 Words   |  5 PagesWar had started because the Americans wanted the same rights the as the British citizens had. The British refused to give Americans the same rights because they (British) didn’t think the Americans shouldn’t be represented as a part of the British Parliament, instead their (British) minds were more focused on building revenue. The British had ignored the Americans demands in which the British thought the Americans demands were a cause of outrage. There were so many different wars that had eruptedRead MoreDivine Intervention : The American Revolution1265 Words   |  6 PagesAmerican Patriots had not been followers of faith, their hard fought fight for independence would have been lost. The effect of God on the revolution was essential to the v ictory of the Americans. Divine intervention led the Continental Army through the hardships of Valley Forge in the terrible winter of 1777. Later in the revolution God would produce two major thunderstorms to weaken the British forces and give the Americans a victory at the Battle of Yorktown. After this the American Army would be quelledRead MoreGeorge Washington s First President1160 Words   |  5 Pagesknow why George Washington had trouble sleeping? Because he couldn t lie! George Washington was the best man to lead the Continental Army. Back in 1775, George Washington, who would later become America s first president, accepts the assignment to lead the Continental Army. The Second Continental Congress unanimously voted and offered him the role of commander in chief. Washington was the perfect choice, because of his military experience from the Virginia Militia in 1753. George Washington s childhoodRead MoreEssay about Biography of George Washington1369 Words   |  6 PagesGeorge Washington an American Hero The Revolutionary War proved to be the most important experience in the transition of Washingtons history. The war made George Washington, a man to be revered in history, and helped transform him into a symbol of a new republic and its principles. George Washington is the Founding Father of our nation. The American Revolution was a result of a series of social, political changes, within American society. Washington played an important political and military positionRead MoreGeorge Washington : The First President Of The United States1415 Words   |  6 PagesGeorge Washington, the First President of the United States, one of the most famous people in his time and in our time, was not always the President of the United States of America. He had an interesting life as Commander in Chief of the Colonial Army, a General in the Colonial Army, a father, and a husband from when he was born in Westmoreland County, Virginia on February 22, 1732, until he died on December 14th, 1799 at Mount Vernon where he had lived two years after he left the presidency. MostRead MoreWas Benedict Arnold a Real Traitor? Essay951 Words   |  4 Pages All the Americans relate George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and Thomas Jefferson as their heroes, but there is a debate whether Benedict Arnold was a victim or a traitor. Arnold was a general during the American Revolutinary War, and he fought for the Continental Army. His name became synonymous with the word traitor. Benedict Arnold was a Revolutionary Hero that had a huge effect on succeeding in the war. He had motivated a lot of soldiers during the war with his victorious discourses, andRead MoreHenry Clinton s First Stop On His Life1210 Words   |  5 PagesNewfoundland, Canada. Sir Henry was the son of Admiral George Clinton and grandson of Sir Francis Fiennes Clinton, who was the 6th Earl of Lincoln. Although nobody knows much about his childhood, we know that as a young child, Henry was influenced greatly by his father. His father joined the navy before the birth of Henry, and impacted his s on as he grew up. His father then became the governor of Newfoundland. Even though his father encouraged his son to join the Navy, young Clinton set sail into aRead MoreGeorge Washington s Secret Six Essay1250 Words   |  5 PagesGeorge Washington’s Secret Six: The Spy Ring That Saved the American Revolution, a monograph written by Brian Kilmeade and Don Yaeger, narrates the Culper Spy Ring’s operation in New York City and its contribution toward the American victory over the Great Britain in the American Revolution. Under the order of General George Washington, Major Benjamin Tallmadge established the Culper Spy Ring with the purpose to outspy the British troops’ activities and movements in Manhattan, therefore allowingRead MoreDual Enrollment Virginia / Us History Essay1614 Words   |  7 Pages NATHANAEL GREENE AND HIS CONTRIBUTION TO THE AMERICAN REVOLUTIONARY WAR Bradley Greiner Dual Enrollment Virginia/US History October 2016 1 From a young age, Nathanael Greene showed much interest in militaries and war, and soon in his life, he got his chance to become a very glorified hero. Potowomut on August 7, 1742. Before the beginning of the war, Greene worked as a blacksmith. His father, also named Nathanael, owned an iron forge, serving as the place of Greene’s work. Also, Greene

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Laissez-faire vs. Government Intervention free essay sample

Sees government intervention In economic affairs means more economic freedom and prosperity. In other words, when people are free to choose and pursue profitable opportunities, the economy of a country runs more efficiently, creating greater wealth and improving the standard of living. While this is a true statement for some people, others argue that government involvement is necessary in order to respond to market failures and limit abuses of market power.Laissez-fairer is a French expression based upon the theories of Adam Smith, an 18 century Scot political economist, whose writings greatly influenced the Roth Of capitalism in several parts Of the world (Biography). Smith believed that as long as markets were free and competitive, the actions of private individuals, would lead to better social results. The idea behind the concept of Laissez-fairer is that economies function more efficiently when people can pursue their economic activities and interests freely.Laissez-fairer opposes governmental regulation and intervention in commerce and states that the government should not interfere with decisions made by individuals. We will write a custom essay sample on Laissez-faire vs. Government Intervention or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The theory also embodies free trade. It indicates that protectionist measures would not be used. Protectionism is a view that free trade is injurious and should be restricted. Protectionist policies are used in order to protect domestic industries. Protectionism is often criticized by the supporters of free trade as harming economies instead of assisting them (Frank and Brenan).Tariff is an example of a protectionist measure which the supporters of Laissez-fairer view as an obstacle to free trade among nations limiting their opportunities to benefit from exchanging goods and services with one another. People who support a laissez fairer system are against minimum wages and NY other forms of trade restrictions. They also consider limited government interference in private economic decisions such as pricing and production of goods and/or services as very beneficial, because it strengthens and makes the economies more efficient (Frank and Brenan). One strong argument against government intervention that the supporters of Laissez-fairer often use is the fact that economic freedom has been shown to associate strongly with higher incomes, higher quality of life, and so on. This means that when government limits its participation, the economies run more efficiently asking it possible for the countries to improve the standard of living. The supporters of Laissez-fairer claim that government does not have any right to accuse thriving companies of having monopoly power.For example, Microsoft Corporation, which is a computer technology corporation with global annual revenue of $44,282 as of July, was accused by the United States of enjoying monopoly power (Income Statement). Many people claim the government is wrongly punishing Microsoft for being productive and successful, arguing that Windows dominates the market because of the products popularity. Others who argue in favor of the government claim that Microsofts monopolistic practi ces are harmful to people who also want to get involved in the same market.Many anti-Microsoft people think that when there is a company such as Microsoft, which is extremely successful, there must be something wrong. These people believe that one has to be doing something illegal in order to become number one in the world and to put other businesses out of the market. This is not always the case. Microsoft simply produces products to satisfy peoples needs and then obviously people from all over the world purchase those products. The company continually releases new and improved versions of its PC operating system.The fact that there are a large numbers of people using Windows makes the product more attractive to consumers. So does the government have the right to interfere in todays marketplace and accuse successful companies of dominating the market? The opponent of Laissez-fairer will most probably say yes and demand the break-up of the giant company. People opposing the theory argue that laissez-fairer practices have not prevented private interests from turning to the government for help on a number of occasions. This fact shows that there were times when free markets experienced problems and had to turn to their local governments for assistance. Another argument against Laissez-fairer is the example of the American agriculture which has benefited from government assistance several times even though it has been private most of the time (Welling). People in favor of government involvement in business affairs argue that the main objectives of government intervention are aimed at preventing monopoly power, which creates a strong potential for market failures and limiting abuses of market power.These people also believe that regulation of UAPITA, goods, and services by government promotes equality, encourages employment, and copes with failures in market. The conclusion that one can draw from all these information is that government intervention seeks to correct the economic damages created by market failure and to improve the efficiency in the way that markets operate. The opponents of laissez-f airer often cite too much economic freedom as a primary cause Of the Great Depression.They point out that increased productivity, easy access to credit, and the uneven distribution of wealth can lead to financial collapse which many years ago caused a rapid economic untrue in the United States. As the depression spread, millions of people lost their jobs. Thousands more traveled from state to state searching for employment. Americans were angry that the attempts to fight the depression were failing. The Great Depression caused a lot of chaos on the stock market, banking, and industries.It not only affected the United States but many European countries as well. Laissez-fairer principles proved unable to deal with the social and economic problems throughout the history. Even though a lot of people still favor Laissez-fairer, most countries today are not representative of it, since they usually involve some amounts of government intervention in the economy. Government intervention includes setting minimum wages, regulation of market competition in order to let other businesses try their luck as well, and so on.The most often cited economy that is regarded to be based on the principles of laissez-fairer is that of Hong Gongs. According to the Economic Freedom of World, 2004 annual Report, Hong Kong is ranked number one for its economic freedom (Odor). There are people who feel that the Laissez-fairer principles are the best and believe that the economies should be based on it, because they think that hen undisturbed by regulation, the natural economic order tends to secure the maximum well-being for the majority of individuals and the surrounding community.On the other hand, those who do not like such economic principles argue that government intervention is vital in the economic affairs if one wants to create equality and avoid abuses of market power in a country. Both sides have strong opinions representing their respective viewpoints , and the vast majority of the population is divided when it comes to taking a stand in the issue. After observing all factors on the two conflicting sides, one can hind that government intervention is the only way an economy can expand for the benefit of its citizens and the country as a whole.